Background

Activist Robby Starbuck, known for his criticism of corporate diversity initiatives, filed a defamation lawsuit against Google. He asserts that the company's artificial‑intelligence system produced statements that falsely associated him with sexual assault allegations and identified him as a white nationalist.

Legal Claims

Starbuck is seeking $15 million in damages from Google. His lawsuit follows a prior action against Meta, where he claimed the social‑media giant's AI incorrectly asserted his participation in the January 6 Capitol riot. Meta settled that case in August and subsequently hired Starbuck as an advisor to address perceived ideological and political bias in its chatbot.

Google's Defense

In its motion to dismiss, Google contends that Starbuck's allegations represent a "misuse of developer tools to induce hallucinations." The company points out that Starbuck did not disclose the specific prompts used to generate the disputed outputs, nor did he identify any individual who was actually misled by the AI statements. Google emphasizes that, to date, no U.S. court has awarded damages for defamation caused by an AI chatbot.

Industry Context

The lawsuit underscores a broader debate over the legal responsibilities of technology firms for content produced by generative AI systems. While Meta chose to settle and engage the plaintiff in advisory capacity, Google is opting to contest the claims in court. The outcome could set a precedent for how courts handle claims of AI‑induced defamation and the extent to which developers are liable for the outputs of their tools.

Current Status

Google has not responded to requests for comment beyond its filed motion, and Starbuck has not provided a response to inquiries about his case. The dispute remains pending as the parties await judicial review of Google's request to dismiss the lawsuit.

Usado: News Factory APP - descubrimiento de noticias y automatización - ChatGPT para Empresas