Personality and Emotional Intelligence

Both AI models were tasked with responding to a scenario where a user feels mixed emotions about a friend’s promotion. Grok 4.1 answered with a colloquial, metaphor‑rich statement that acknowledged the conflict and added profanity, aiming for a “witty” tone. ChatGPT 5.1 provided a more measured response, recognizing the dual feelings without resorting to aggressive imagery. When asked to explain a love of rainy days in its natural voice, Grok 4.1 produced a heavily meme‑infused monologue, using phrases like “cheat code for existing without apology” and “moody gremlins.” ChatGPT 5.1 answered with a calm, relatable description, likening rain to a volume‑lowering button and background music.

Reliability and Accuracy

The test included a request for a concise health summary on long‑term sleep deprivation, limited to under 120 words with no exaggeration. Grok 4.1 delivered bullet points and claimed a word count of 98, though the actual count was 73. ChatGPT 5.1 produced a single paragraph of 82 words and did not claim a word count. Neither model hallucinated or spread misinformation, but Grok’s inaccurate word‑count claim raised questions about trustworthiness.

Overall Impressions

Grok 4.1 markets itself as faster, wittier, and more emotionally sophisticated, often showcasing a youthful, slang‑heavy persona. Its responses can feel like a performance rather than a genuine conversation, especially when it leans into meme culture. ChatGPT 5.1, while not claiming the same level of speed, offers clearer, more human‑like language and maintains consistency without unnecessary flair. Both models performed safely on factual queries, yet Grok’s misreporting of word count suggests a need for greater reliability. The comparison underscores each model’s distinct trade‑offs: Grok’s bold personality versus ChatGPT’s smoother, more conventional communication style.

Usado: News Factory APP - descoberta e automação de notícias - ChatGPT para Empresas