Stability AI, the maker of the Stable Diffusion AI art tool, achieved a partial victory in a British High Court case against Getty Images. While the judge ruled that Stability infringed Getty’s trademark by reproducing watermarks, the core claim of secondary copyright infringement was dismissed. The case, the first major AI copyright dispute to reach England’s High Court, failed to establish a clear precedent on whether AI models need permission to train on copyrighted works. Getty continues its fight in a separate U.S. lawsuit, and the decision adds to a growing wave of legal battles between AI firms and creative rightsholders. Read more →

In a London courtroom, Justice Joanna Smith concluded that Stability AI, the maker of Stable Diffusion, did not violate copyright law when training its image models on Getty Images' content. The ruling emphasized that the AI system does not store or reproduce protected works. However, the judgment noted that Stability AI breached Getty's trademark rights by allowing users to generate images resembling Getty and iStock logos. The decision is narrowly scoped, offering a mixed outcome for both the AI developer and intellectual‑property owners. Read more →

The Content Overseas Distribution Association (CODA), representing Japanese intellectual‑property owners such as Studio Ghibli, Bandai Namco and Square Enix, has sent a formal letter to OpenAI urging the company to stop using its members’ works to train the Sora 2 image‑generation model. CODA argues that the replication process involved in machine learning may constitute copyright infringement and that the opt‑out policy offered by OpenAI could violate Japanese law. The association is seeking a sincere response and an immediate cessation of any further use of its members’ content for training purposes. Read more →

U.S. District Judge William Alsup has approved a $1.5 billion settlement between Anthropic, an artificial‑intelligence firm, and a group of authors who alleged the company used copyrighted books without permission. The deal requires Anthropic to pay $3,000 per covered work and includes a notification plan for authors. The case highlighted Anthropic’s reliance on shadow libraries such as LibGen and the systematic acquisition and scanning of used books. While the settlement resolves the current dispute, it underscores ongoing legal scrutiny of AI training data and copyright law. Read more →