Google Lens is being embraced as a versatile AI‑powered visual search tool that helps users translate text, identify objects, verify product details, and gather contextual information in real time. By simply pointing a phone camera at an item or scene, the service delivers instant translations, product comparisons, and educational overviews, making it a practical companion for travel, shopping, and everyday curiosity. Users report increased confidence when navigating foreign menus, confirming rental listings, and exploring unfamiliar art, highlighting the tool’s growing role in daily digital interactions. Read more →

A Reddit user posted a altered version of the Ebbinghaus optical illusion to test ChatGPT's image analysis. The AI incorrectly asserted that the two orange circles were the same size, despite the modification that made one circle visibly larger. Even after a prolonged dialogue of about fifteen minutes, ChatGPT remained convinced of its answer and did not adjust its reasoning. The episode highlights concerns about the chatbot’s reliance on internet image matching, its resistance to corrective feedback, and broader questions about the reliability of AI tools for visual tasks. Read more →

A Reddit user posted a altered version of the Ebbinghaus optical illusion to test ChatGPT's image analysis. The AI incorrectly asserted that the two orange circles were the same size, despite the modification that made one circle visibly larger. Even after a prolonged dialogue of about fifteen minutes, ChatGPT remained convinced of its answer and did not adjust its reasoning. The episode highlights concerns about the chatbot’s reliance on internet image matching, its resistance to corrective feedback, and broader questions about the reliability of AI tools for visual tasks. Read more →

A Reddit user posted a altered version of the Ebbinghaus optical illusion to test ChatGPT's image analysis. The AI incorrectly asserted that the two orange circles were the same size, despite the modification that made one circle visibly larger. Even after a prolonged dialogue of about fifteen minutes, ChatGPT remained convinced of its answer and did not adjust its reasoning. The episode highlights concerns about the chatbot’s reliance on internet image matching, its resistance to corrective feedback, and broader questions about the reliability of AI tools for visual tasks. Read more →

A Reddit user posted a altered version of the Ebbinghaus optical illusion to test ChatGPT's image analysis. The AI incorrectly asserted that the two orange circles were the same size, despite the modification that made one circle visibly larger. Even after a prolonged dialogue of about fifteen minutes, ChatGPT remained convinced of its answer and did not adjust its reasoning. The episode highlights concerns about the chatbot’s reliance on internet image matching, its resistance to corrective feedback, and broader questions about the reliability of AI tools for visual tasks. Read more →

A Reddit user posted a altered version of the Ebbinghaus optical illusion to test ChatGPT's image analysis. The AI incorrectly asserted that the two orange circles were the same size, despite the modification that made one circle visibly larger. Even after a prolonged dialogue of about fifteen minutes, ChatGPT remained convinced of its answer and did not adjust its reasoning. The episode highlights concerns about the chatbot’s reliance on internet image matching, its resistance to corrective feedback, and broader questions about the reliability of AI tools for visual tasks. Read more →