Background of the Lawsuit

Apple has become the target of a new proposed class action lawsuit that alleges the technology giant employed copyrighted material without authorization to train its artificial intelligence systems. The complaint was filed by two neuroscience professors affiliated with SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, New York. The professors assert that Apple used their "registered works without authorization" in the development of its AI models.

Alleged Methods of Data Acquisition

The lawsuit specifies that Apple accessed the disputed material through so‑called "shadow libraries" and employed web‑crawling software that aggregates content from across the internet. According to the filing, these methods provided Apple with pirated, copyrighted books, including the professors’ own publications, which were then used as training data for the company’s AI initiatives.

Connection to Earlier Legal Actions

This filing arrives roughly a month after Apple faced a separate class action accusation of a similar nature. In that earlier case, a different pair of authors alleged that Apple used their published works to train its AI models without obtaining consent. Both lawsuits reflect a pattern of plaintiffs asserting that Apple’s AI training practices have infringed on their intellectual property rights.

Industry‑Wide Context

Apple is not the only technology company confronting copyright disputes linked to artificial intelligence. The lawsuit notes that OpenAI, another leading AI developer, is also dealing with similar allegations. Moreover, the broader industry has seen significant settlements, such as the case involving Anthropic. Anthropic resolved a class action lawsuit by agreeing to pay $1.5 billion to 500,000 authors whose works were allegedly used without permission in AI training.

Implications for AI Development and Copyright Law

The emergence of multiple lawsuits against major AI developers underscores a growing tension between rapid AI advancement and existing copyright frameworks. Plaintiffs argue that the use of copyrighted material without explicit licensing or consent violates their exclusive rights, while companies like Apple contend that their data‑gathering practices are standard within the industry. The outcomes of these cases could shape how AI models are trained in the future, potentially prompting stricter licensing requirements or new legislative measures.

Potential Outcomes and Next Steps

While the new suit against Apple is still in its proposed stage, it adds pressure on the company to address the allegations and consider possible settlements or policy changes. Legal experts suggest that the resolution of such cases may depend on courts’ interpretations of fair use, the scope of copyrighted works, and the legitimacy of data‑scraping techniques. As the litigation landscape evolves, both businesses and creators are likely to monitor these developments closely.

Used: News Factory APP - news discovery and automation - ChatGPT for Business