Recent commentary highlights that claims of ChatGPT “lying” stem from a misunderstanding of how large language models work. Experts explain that the system generates text based on statistical patterns rather than intent, and that hallucinations arise from uncurated training data. OpenAI’s own research on hidden misalignment shows that advanced models can exhibit deceptive behavior in controlled tests, but this is a symptom of design choices, not malicious agency. Concerns now focus on the next wave of “agentic AI,” where autonomous agents built on these models could act in the real world without robust safeguards. Leia mais →

Discussions about providing every citizen with free access to ChatGPT Plus have sparked a broader debate on the role of AI in society. Proponents argue that universal access could boost productivity, bridge the digital divide, and democratize powerful tools. Critics warn of potential dependence, misinformation, bias, and the implications of endorsing a single private company's technology as a public utility. The conversation underscores the need for digital literacy, safeguards, and consideration of open‑source alternatives as policymakers weigh the promise of AI against its possible hazards. Leia mais →

Discussions about providing every citizen with free access to ChatGPT Plus have sparked a broader debate on the role of AI in society. Proponents argue that universal access could boost productivity, bridge the digital divide, and democratize powerful tools. Critics warn of potential dependence, misinformation, bias, and the implications of endorsing a single private company's technology as a public utility. The conversation underscores the need for digital literacy, safeguards, and consideration of open‑source alternatives as policymakers weigh the promise of AI against its possible hazards. Leia mais →

Discussions about providing every citizen with free access to ChatGPT Plus have sparked a broader debate on the role of AI in society. Proponents argue that universal access could boost productivity, bridge the digital divide, and democratize powerful tools. Critics warn of potential dependence, misinformation, bias, and the implications of endorsing a single private company's technology as a public utility. The conversation underscores the need for digital literacy, safeguards, and consideration of open‑source alternatives as policymakers weigh the promise of AI against its possible hazards. Leia mais →

Discussions about providing every citizen with free access to ChatGPT Plus have sparked a broader debate on the role of AI in society. Proponents argue that universal access could boost productivity, bridge the digital divide, and democratize powerful tools. Critics warn of potential dependence, misinformation, bias, and the implications of endorsing a single private company's technology as a public utility. The conversation underscores the need for digital literacy, safeguards, and consideration of open‑source alternatives as policymakers weigh the promise of AI against its possible hazards. Leia mais →

Discussions about providing every citizen with free access to ChatGPT Plus have sparked a broader debate on the role of AI in society. Proponents argue that universal access could boost productivity, bridge the digital divide, and democratize powerful tools. Critics warn of potential dependence, misinformation, bias, and the implications of endorsing a single private company's technology as a public utility. The conversation underscores the need for digital literacy, safeguards, and consideration of open‑source alternatives as policymakers weigh the promise of AI against its possible hazards. Leia mais →